Illuminate Ur Self
Please register and join our discussions. Illuminate Your Self, started as a closed forum, and has recently opened for new membership. We offer a wide array of topics from Global and Local Political News, to Middle East Confrontations, to Conspiracy Theories. Bring your expertise.

Have a Blog dedicated to similar topics ? Join the forum and we willl host your Blog Link on our Index page for all to see.

What are you waiting for ? We know you have an opinion !


Between Conspiracy Theories, Rumors, Twisted Words, and lies, there is a reality of what is
 
HomePortalRegisterLog in

We have moved to www.illuminateurself.com, PLEASE re-register for a new account there.  We are no longer posting in this forum.  Thank you !

What is your Dinar Worth?
Search
 
 

Display results as :
 
Rechercher Advanced Search
Latest topics
» Obama tells Jews to stop building homes – in Israel!
Tue Sep 01, 2009 10:07 pm by akumamenra

» U.S. Economy Trending Towards an Inflationary Depression -MUST READ
Tue Sep 01, 2009 9:53 pm by akumamenra

» Switzerland appears to succumb to pressure on banking regulations
Thu Aug 27, 2009 8:27 pm by Illumin8

» Hollywood Assualting us with FEAR MOVIES
Thu Aug 20, 2009 2:07 am by niteowl

» The Spreading of World Hatred
Tue Aug 18, 2009 11:42 pm by Lisa

» OBAMA HEALTH CARE THE DIRTY LITTLE SECRET
Tue Aug 18, 2009 11:39 pm by Lisa

» The Thieves of Baghdad
Tue Aug 18, 2009 11:37 pm by Lisa

» George Soros' Shadow Party ~ Must Read
Tue Aug 18, 2009 11:34 pm by David

» What would Saul Alinsky Do ?
Tue Aug 18, 2009 11:32 pm by David

» NEW PARTY (NP)
Tue Aug 18, 2009 11:29 pm by Katherine

» Open Letter to Obama
Tue Aug 18, 2009 11:27 pm by Jane

» Must See 4 part Video Stewart Rhodes/Alex Jones TV
Tue Aug 18, 2009 11:18 pm by Justin

» Free wood for cooking and heat
Sun Aug 16, 2009 11:14 pm by Solutions

» BooKs.....
Sun Aug 16, 2009 2:23 pm by northern_alliance

» Go Solar when it comes to a generator
Sun Aug 16, 2009 1:58 am by Solutions

» Solar back up
Sun Aug 16, 2009 1:56 am by Solutions

» Ready made meals for the pantry or bunker
Sun Aug 16, 2009 1:27 am by Solutions

» Gov cash for your computer hard drive whoops I ment cash for clunkers
Sun Aug 16, 2009 1:14 am by Solutions

» The American Holocaust - Coming to a FEMA camp near you
Sun Aug 16, 2009 1:08 am by Solutions

» Illuninating Library Book Index
Sat Aug 15, 2009 10:28 pm by northern_alliance

» Obama's CZARS (as of 7-8-09)
Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:30 pm by Illumin8

» Silencing Dissent
Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:21 pm by Illumin8

» Constitution Article I, Section 8
Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:19 pm by Illumin8

» Containers you name it they got it
Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:18 pm by Solutions

» Seeds and Sprouts dealers
Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:16 pm by Solutions

» Obamacare and what our Constitution says
Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:15 pm by Illumin8

» Top 12 Food Additives to Remove From Your Diet
Fri Aug 14, 2009 9:58 pm by Solutions

» Human chipping and items you buy are chipped
Fri Aug 14, 2009 9:56 pm by Solutions

» What's in your wallet? "THEY" know!
Fri Aug 14, 2009 9:51 pm by Solutions

» Earthquake Safety Tips
Fri Aug 14, 2009 9:47 pm by Solutions

Visits
Get Involved


 

 


topics

Share | 
 

 Obama takes a hard line on Israel

Go down 
AuthorMessage
Illumin8
Admin
Admin
avatar

Number of posts : 345

PostSubject: Obama takes a hard line on Israel   Mon Aug 03, 2009 9:37 pm

The President Takes a Hard Line on Israel


Yet he doesn’t want to be seen as ‘meddling’ in Iran



By MACKUBIN THOMAS OWENS


In foreign policy, President Barack Obama has demonstrated a disturbing propensity to curry favor with our adversaries at the expense of our friends.

The Czechs and Poles are rightly concerned that they will be sacrificed on the altar of better U.S. relations with Russia. And the Israelis fear that the Obama administration’s desired opening to the Muslim world will be achieved at their expense. Mr. Obama’s attempted bullying of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is a case in point.

Mr. Netanyahu was sworn in as Israel’s prime minister on March 31. Shortly thereafter, the Obama administration confronted Israel’s new leader in a very public way regarding Israeli settlements in the West Bank, an area partially controlled by the Palestinian National Authority. This was an extremely unusual way for an American president to greet the new leader of a liberal democracy that’s a close ally of the U.S.

The Obama administration was not satisfied with a series of understandings crafted by the Bush administration that, while not freezing settlements, had nonetheless achieved a significant reduction in settlement construction. During a May press conference with the Egyptian foreign minister, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton announced that Mr. Obama “wants to see a stop to settlements—not some settlements, not outposts, not natural-growth exceptions.”

Subsequently, Mr. Obama demanded that Israel freeze construction in east Jerusalem. Of course, Mr. Netanyahu rejected Mr. Obama’s demand. He declared that Jerusalem is an open, undivided city “that has no separation according to religion or national affiliation.” Mr. Netanyahu added that “we cannot accept the idea that Jews will not have the right to live and purchase in all parts of Jerusalem.”

If Jews were prohibited from buying property in New York, London, Paris or Rome, there would be an international outcry. Why, Mr. Netanyahu wondered, should the standard be different for Jerusalem?

Mr. Obama is woefully wrong if he believes that his confrontational style will provide an incentive for the Palestinians and the members of the Arab League to resolve the Arab-Israeli dispute. It will simply reinforce the long-standing Arab belief that the U.S. can “deliver” Israel if it only has the will to do so, thereby reducing Arab incentives to make concessions in direct negotiations with Israel.

As if on cue, Mahmoud Abbas, the leader of the Palestinian National Authority, announced that he would not negotiate on any issue with the new Israeli government until Mr. Obama’s settlement conditions are met.

In addition to the building freeze in Jerusalem and the West Bank, Mr. Abbas insisted on four other unilateral, non-negotiable concessions: First, an independent Palestinian state; second, that Israel pulls back to its pre-June 1967 borders, minus a Palestinian land bridge between the West Bank and the Gaza Strip; third, a Palestinian “right of return” to Israel; and fourth, resolution of all permanent status issues on the basis of the 2002 Abdullah plan calling on Arabs to normalize relations with Israel in return for Israel’s withdrawal to its pre-1967 borders. The “right of return,” in particular, is a non-starter.

If Mr. Obama seeks a Palestinian Arab state, he is going about it the wrong way. The fact is that Mr. Netanyahu has endorsed a two-state solution and an end to the expansion of settlements in the West Bank—as long as the Palestinians accept Israel as a legitimate Jewish state and cannot militarily threaten it. Israel has been willing to accept a two-state solution since the United Nations partition resolution for Palestine in 1947, but the Arabs have refused. They are not interested in creating a separate Palestinian Arab state but in destroying Israel as a Jewish state.
The Obama approach in the Middle East is predicated on what might be called the Arab “grievance narrative,” which holds that Israel was created as a result of Western guilt about the Holocaust. It is also based on the idea that, as the president suggested in his Cairo speech, there is moral equivalence between the Holocaust and Palestinian “dislocation.”

Such language illustrates an inability to make distinctions. Arabs launched a war against Jewish self-determination and the state of Israel long before any Israeli “occupation” of their lands. When Israel seized land in a defensive war, it was the Arabs, not the Israelis, who kept Palestinian “refugees” in limbo for three generations to await Israel’s destruction.

As Mr. Netanyahu reminded Mr. Obama after the latter’s Cairo speech, the Arab claim that Israel was a land grab by the great powers to salve the collective conscience of the West after the Holocaust is a slander. On the contrary, he observed, Israel’s right to its homeland rests on the longstanding historical connection of the Jewish people to the land of Israel. This right was ratified by the unanimous and legitimizing votes of the League of Nations and the U.N. Security Council’s permanent members, and validated by over 60 years of Israel’s successful, democratic statehood.
Israel’s “right to exist” was expressed best by Israeli diplomat Abba Eban in 1981. He wrote, “Israel’s right to exist, like that of the United States, Saudi Arabia, and 152 other states, is axiomatic and unreserved. Israel’s legitimacy is not suspended in midair, awaiting acknowledgment. . . . There is certainly no other state, big or small, young or old, that would consider mere recognition of its ‘right to exist’ a favor, or a negotiable concession.”

Mr. Netanyahu might also have added that Israel’s control of the West Bank (territory that should properly be called “disputed” rather than “occupied”), was the result of defeating the Arab powers who initiated the Six Day War of 1967. The status of aggressors and defenders is not interchangeable. Neither is the status of victorious powers and defeated ones.

Nonetheless, Israel has taken unilateral steps toward peace, steps not reciprocated by the Palestinians. When Israel unilaterally disengaged from the Gaza Strip, dismantling 21 settlements and displacing over 9,000 residents, it conducted the most comprehensive test of the “land for peace” concept in the history of Israeli-Palestinian relations. Yet Israel was rewarded with the creation of a terrorist enclave governed by Hamas, rather than the peaceful, responsible neighbor Israel would need in order to accept a Palestinian Arab state.

Unlike Hamas, the corrupt Palestinian National Authority that holds sway in the West Bank has nominally accepted Israel’s right to exist but has never given up the “right of return” for Palestinian “refugees.” That right, if implemented, would mean the end of Israel’s existence.

Peace between the Israelis and the Palestinians requires compromises on both sides. U.S. pressure on Israel, without any on the Palestinians, will not achieve the desired outcome.

Earlier this summer, the president justified his decision to downplay even rhetorical support for the Iranian protesters who rose up against their government and its fraudulent election. He did not wish the U.S. to appear to be “meddling” in Iranian affairs. He apparently feels no similar constraint when it comes to Israel.
Mr. Owens is editor of Orbis, the quarterly journal of the Foreign Policy Research Institute.

_________________
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"You take the blue pill, the story ends, you wake up in your bed, and believe whatever you want to believe.
You take the red pill, you stay in Wonderland, and I show you just how deep the rabbit hole goes."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Back to top Go down
http://www.pre2012.com
Katherine
Member
Member


Number of posts : 18

PostSubject: Re: Obama takes a hard line on Israel   Thu Aug 06, 2009 4:13 am

Excellent analysis! Bravo Mr. Owens!!! Obama still enjoys an enormous support from European liberals, but this honey-moon is coming to the end. As soon as people here will realize that we are left to the mercy of a new Russian empire, not to mention millions of Muslims who hate our life style, without Amercan umbrella, they will miss Bush. America has a destiny and its greatness was always in protecting freedom and justice around the world. With this president, however, all of us and not just Israelis, are in big-big troubles.
Back to top Go down
Swathi
Member
Member


Number of posts : 13

PostSubject: Re: Obama takes a hard line on Israel   Thu Aug 06, 2009 4:19 am

True.
Democrats of Jewish faith were active and vocal opponents of President Bush. They also were active and vocal supporters of candidate Obama despite clear statements of his intent in the Middle East. They got their man and now are displeased with the result? Too bad!
Back to top Go down
Sponsored content




PostSubject: Re: Obama takes a hard line on Israel   

Back to top Go down
 
Obama takes a hard line on Israel
Back to top 
Page 1 of 1
 Similar topics
-
» Israel Santos, 35 days old, found dead in trash with crushed skull
» What is the Capital of Israel?
» Valerie Jarrett’s Father-in-Law Was a Communist – Worked With Obama Mentor Frank Marshall Davis
» Obama’s College Classmate: ‘The Obama Scandal Is at Columbia’
» Kenya declares holiday for Obama

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Illuminate Ur Self  :: "The Truth & the Light" Spiritual Teachings :: Revealing all in Revelations :: Israel End Times and Political Egos-
Jump to:  
Free forum | © phpBB | Free forum support | Contact | Report an abuse | Forumotion.com