Illuminate Ur Self
Please register and join our discussions. Illuminate Your Self, started as a closed forum, and has recently opened for new membership. We offer a wide array of topics from Global and Local Political News, to Middle East Confrontations, to Conspiracy Theories. Bring your expertise.

Have a Blog dedicated to similar topics ? Join the forum and we willl host your Blog Link on our Index page for all to see.

What are you waiting for ? We know you have an opinion !

Between Conspiracy Theories, Rumors, Twisted Words, and lies, there is a reality of what is
HomePortalRegisterLog in

We have moved to, PLEASE re-register for a new account there.  We are no longer posting in this forum.  Thank you !

What is your Dinar Worth?

Display results as :
Rechercher Advanced Search
Latest topics
» Obama tells Jews to stop building homes – in Israel!
Tue Sep 01, 2009 10:07 pm by akumamenra

» U.S. Economy Trending Towards an Inflationary Depression -MUST READ
Tue Sep 01, 2009 9:53 pm by akumamenra

» Switzerland appears to succumb to pressure on banking regulations
Thu Aug 27, 2009 8:27 pm by Illumin8

» Hollywood Assualting us with FEAR MOVIES
Thu Aug 20, 2009 2:07 am by niteowl

» The Spreading of World Hatred
Tue Aug 18, 2009 11:42 pm by Lisa

Tue Aug 18, 2009 11:39 pm by Lisa

» The Thieves of Baghdad
Tue Aug 18, 2009 11:37 pm by Lisa

» George Soros' Shadow Party ~ Must Read
Tue Aug 18, 2009 11:34 pm by David

» What would Saul Alinsky Do ?
Tue Aug 18, 2009 11:32 pm by David

Tue Aug 18, 2009 11:29 pm by Katherine

» Open Letter to Obama
Tue Aug 18, 2009 11:27 pm by Jane

» Must See 4 part Video Stewart Rhodes/Alex Jones TV
Tue Aug 18, 2009 11:18 pm by Justin

» Free wood for cooking and heat
Sun Aug 16, 2009 11:14 pm by Solutions

» BooKs.....
Sun Aug 16, 2009 2:23 pm by northern_alliance

» Go Solar when it comes to a generator
Sun Aug 16, 2009 1:58 am by Solutions

» Solar back up
Sun Aug 16, 2009 1:56 am by Solutions

» Ready made meals for the pantry or bunker
Sun Aug 16, 2009 1:27 am by Solutions

» Gov cash for your computer hard drive whoops I ment cash for clunkers
Sun Aug 16, 2009 1:14 am by Solutions

» The American Holocaust - Coming to a FEMA camp near you
Sun Aug 16, 2009 1:08 am by Solutions

» Illuninating Library Book Index
Sat Aug 15, 2009 10:28 pm by northern_alliance

» Obama's CZARS (as of 7-8-09)
Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:30 pm by Illumin8

» Silencing Dissent
Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:21 pm by Illumin8

» Constitution Article I, Section 8
Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:19 pm by Illumin8

» Containers you name it they got it
Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:18 pm by Solutions

» Seeds and Sprouts dealers
Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:16 pm by Solutions

» Obamacare and what our Constitution says
Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:15 pm by Illumin8

» Top 12 Food Additives to Remove From Your Diet
Fri Aug 14, 2009 9:58 pm by Solutions

» Human chipping and items you buy are chipped
Fri Aug 14, 2009 9:56 pm by Solutions

» What's in your wallet? "THEY" know!
Fri Aug 14, 2009 9:51 pm by Solutions

» Earthquake Safety Tips
Fri Aug 14, 2009 9:47 pm by Solutions

Get Involved




Share | 

 Obama Proposes Signing Treaty To Ban Reloading

Go down 

Number of posts : 79

PostSubject: Obama Proposes Signing Treaty To Ban Reloading   Wed Jul 08, 2009 6:38 pm

GOA's CIFTA Treaty Analysis
Obama Proposes Signing Treaty To Ban Reloading
-- Even BB guns could be on the chopping block

Gun Owners of America Fact Sheet
8001 Forbes Place, Suite 102, Springfield, VA 22151
Phone: 703-321-8585 / FAX: 703-321-8408

When President Obama went to Mexico in April, he proposed that the United States sign the Inter-American Convention Against Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives, and Other Related Materials.

Despite the fact that it purportedly deals with “illicit manufacturing and trafficking,” GOA is convinced that this convention defines these terms much more broadly and potentially presents serious dangers to Americans lawfully exercising their Second Amendment rights.


Although the word “illicit” is used extensively in order to make the convention sound less anti-gun than it actually is, we need to look very carefully at the purposes and definitions to see whether it is, in fact, limited in scope to persons illegally moving guns across borders in order to arm violent criminal cartels:

The seventh precatory clause “STRESS[ES] the need, in peace processes and post-conflict situations, to achieve effective control of firearms, ammunition, explosives, and other related materials in order to prevent their entry into the illicit market;” -- thereby endorsing comprehensive gun and ammunition control, in violation of McClure-Volkmer (which deregulated ammunition) and of the Second Amendment to the Constitution.

Furthermore, the tenth precatory clause supports a “know-your-customer policy for dealers [in firearms]” -- something which would rapidly lead to an abolition of firearms in a country as large and transient as the United States.

And the twelfth precatory clause acknowledges the rights of parties to enact their own gun laws, but only with respect to aspects of a “wholly domestic character.”

We have seen, as recently as the April 15 New York Times, how battles with the Mexican drug cartels have been fanned into an issue which is being used to justify the passage of every major gun control initiative in modern American history.

We see how these “slippery slope” findings are actually implemented when we look at the definitions:

“Illicit manufacturing” of firearms is defined as “assembly of firearms [or] ammunition... without a license...”

Hence, reloading ammunition -- or putting together a lawful firearm from a kit -- is clearly “illicit manufacturing.” Modifying a firearm in any way would surely be “illicit manufacturing.” And, while it would be a stretch, assembling a firearm after cleaning it could, in any plain reading of the words, come within the screwy definition of “illicit manufacturing.”

“Firearm” has a similarly questionable definition. Borrowing from the open-ended definitions in federal law which have continue to vex us (and people like Olofson in Wisconsin), any barreled weapon “which... may be readily converted to expel a bullet” would be a firearm. Even worse, “any other weapon” (a term which is not defined) is a “firearm.” This surely includes BB guns -- and who knows what else.

“Cartridge cases” and “projectiles” are defined as “ammunition.”


In Article IV, parties commit to adopting “necessary legislative or other measures” to criminalize illicit manufacturing and trafficking in firearms. Remember that “illicit manufacturing” includes reloading and modifying or assembling any firearm in any way. And, while treaties should not trump the Bill of Rights (in contrast to what the Supreme Court held in Missouri v. Holland), they do have the force of statute -- which would mean that the Obama administration could promulgate regulations on the basis of this treaty which would ban any modification or machining of any firearm in any manner whatsoever except by license of the government.

Article IV goes on to state that the criminalized acts should include “association or conspiracy” in connection with “said offenses” -- which is arguably a term broad enough to allow, by regulation, the criminalization of entire pro-gun organizations or gun clubs, based on the facilities which they provide their membership.

Article V requires each party to “adopt such measures as may be necessary to establish its jurisdiction over the offenses it has established in accordance with this Convention” under a variety of circumstances. We know that Mexico is blaming U.S. gun dealers for the fact that its streets are flowing with blood. And we know it is possible for it to define offenses “committed in its territory” in a very broad way. And we know that we have an extradition obligation under Article XIX of the convention. And we also know that other countries such as Spain have tried to use their treaty powers to put American officials on trial.

Article VI requires “appropriate markings” on firearms. And, it is not inconceivable that this provision could be used to require microstamping of firearms and/or ammunition -- a requirement which is clearly intended to impose specifications which are not technologically possible or which are possible only at a prohibitively expensive cost.

Article VII requires confiscation and forfeiture of illicit firearms.

Articles VIII, IX, and X would increase the role of government, in ways which cannot be foreseen, in supervising the import and export of firearms and ammunition.

Article XI requires the maintenance of any records, for a “reasonable time,” that the government determines to be necessary to trace firearms. This provision would almost certainly repeal portions of McClure-Volkmer and could arguably be used to require a national registry or database.

Article XIII authorizes the “exchange of information” with respect to FFL’s -- presumably providing information on Americans to the corrupt Mexican police which are the source of many, if not most, of the illicit firearms.

Finally, under Article XXIX, if Mexico demands the extradition of a lawful American gun dealer, the U.S. would be required to resolve the dispute through “other means of peaceful settlement.” Does anyone want to risk sweltering in a Mexican jail at the mercy of the Obama administration?

This fact sheet was prepared by Mike Hammond, GOA’s legislative counsel.
Back to top Go down
Obama Proposes Signing Treaty To Ban Reloading
Back to top 
Page 1 of 1
 Similar topics
» Did Barack Obama actually, legitimately, fairly and legally win the election?
» WOW! The Obama economy is roaring back!
» Có 3 người giống hệt TT Obama
» Why Obama does not want to meet with Putin
» Obama Jobs Record vs St Ronnie Reagan's

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Illuminate Ur Self  :: US Politics Area :: Radicals among US :: Washington's Weekly-
Jump to:  
Create a forum on Forumotion | © phpBB | Free forum support | Contact | Report an abuse |