Illuminate Ur Self
Please register and join our discussions. Illuminate Your Self, started as a closed forum, and has recently opened for new membership. We offer a wide array of topics from Global and Local Political News, to Middle East Confrontations, to Conspiracy Theories. Bring your expertise.

Have a Blog dedicated to similar topics ? Join the forum and we willl host your Blog Link on our Index page for all to see.

What are you waiting for ? We know you have an opinion !


Between Conspiracy Theories, Rumors, Twisted Words, and lies, there is a reality of what is
 
HomePortalRegisterLog in

We have moved to www.illuminateurself.com, PLEASE re-register for a new account there.  We are no longer posting in this forum.  Thank you !

What is your Dinar Worth?
Search
 
 

Display results as :
 
Rechercher Advanced Search
Latest topics
» Obama tells Jews to stop building homes – in Israel!
Tue Sep 01, 2009 10:07 pm by akumamenra

» U.S. Economy Trending Towards an Inflationary Depression -MUST READ
Tue Sep 01, 2009 9:53 pm by akumamenra

» Switzerland appears to succumb to pressure on banking regulations
Thu Aug 27, 2009 8:27 pm by Illumin8

» Hollywood Assualting us with FEAR MOVIES
Thu Aug 20, 2009 2:07 am by niteowl

» The Spreading of World Hatred
Tue Aug 18, 2009 11:42 pm by Lisa

» OBAMA HEALTH CARE THE DIRTY LITTLE SECRET
Tue Aug 18, 2009 11:39 pm by Lisa

» The Thieves of Baghdad
Tue Aug 18, 2009 11:37 pm by Lisa

» George Soros' Shadow Party ~ Must Read
Tue Aug 18, 2009 11:34 pm by David

» What would Saul Alinsky Do ?
Tue Aug 18, 2009 11:32 pm by David

» NEW PARTY (NP)
Tue Aug 18, 2009 11:29 pm by Katherine

» Open Letter to Obama
Tue Aug 18, 2009 11:27 pm by Jane

» Must See 4 part Video Stewart Rhodes/Alex Jones TV
Tue Aug 18, 2009 11:18 pm by Justin

» Free wood for cooking and heat
Sun Aug 16, 2009 11:14 pm by Solutions

» BooKs.....
Sun Aug 16, 2009 2:23 pm by northern_alliance

» Go Solar when it comes to a generator
Sun Aug 16, 2009 1:58 am by Solutions

» Solar back up
Sun Aug 16, 2009 1:56 am by Solutions

» Ready made meals for the pantry or bunker
Sun Aug 16, 2009 1:27 am by Solutions

» Gov cash for your computer hard drive whoops I ment cash for clunkers
Sun Aug 16, 2009 1:14 am by Solutions

» The American Holocaust - Coming to a FEMA camp near you
Sun Aug 16, 2009 1:08 am by Solutions

» Illuninating Library Book Index
Sat Aug 15, 2009 10:28 pm by northern_alliance

» Obama's CZARS (as of 7-8-09)
Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:30 pm by Illumin8

» Silencing Dissent
Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:21 pm by Illumin8

» Constitution Article I, Section 8
Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:19 pm by Illumin8

» Containers you name it they got it
Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:18 pm by Solutions

» Seeds and Sprouts dealers
Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:16 pm by Solutions

» Obamacare and what our Constitution says
Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:15 pm by Illumin8

» Top 12 Food Additives to Remove From Your Diet
Fri Aug 14, 2009 9:58 pm by Solutions

» Human chipping and items you buy are chipped
Fri Aug 14, 2009 9:56 pm by Solutions

» What's in your wallet? "THEY" know!
Fri Aug 14, 2009 9:51 pm by Solutions

» Earthquake Safety Tips
Fri Aug 14, 2009 9:47 pm by Solutions

Visits
Get Involved


 

 


topics

Share | 
 

 Sotomayor’s Got Some ’Splainin’ To Do

Go down 
AuthorMessage
Boots06
Member
Member
avatar

Number of posts : 79

PostSubject: Sotomayor’s Got Some ’Splainin’ To Do   Fri Jun 26, 2009 1:40 pm

Sotomayor’s Got Some ’Splainin’ To Do

For the past couple of weeks, the mainstream media and the political pundits have been relatively quiet concerning President Barack Obama’s nomination of Judge Sonia Sotomayor to the U.S. Supreme Court. But that near silence will most certainly end starting next week.

Judge Sotomayor’s confirmation hearings before the Senate Judiciary Committee won’t begin until mid July. However, next week marks the end of the Supreme Court’s current term and with it the justices’ decision in what has been left as the highest profile case yet to be decided -- Ricci v. DeStefano, No. 07-1428 (a.k.a. the New Haven firefighters case).

On its own, the New Haven firefighters case would be a blockbuster. It raises the most difficult and divisive of constitutional and statutory issues: Whether a city can refuse to promote and throw out the results of a promotion exam simply because white and Hispanic firefighters scored higher than their black colleagues.
But the Ricci case isn’t just the most significant case still pending on the High Court’s docket, it’s also a case that was decided by Judge Sotomayor in her current role as a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

A year ago, along with two other federal appeals court judges, Judge Sotomayor upheld the district court’s ruling against the white and Hispanic firefighters who sued to force the City of New Haven to promote them based on their top-ranked scores in the promotions process. Even more significantly, Judge Sotomayor ruled against the firefighters’ discrimination claims in a decision that consists of essentially one paragraph. In other words, despite the importance and complexity of the case -- one that garnered the attention of the Supreme Court -- it appears that either Judge Sotomayor (and her two colleagues) thought almost nothing of the case and the issues it raised or tried to bury it.

Regardless, the Ricci case quickly got all of the attention it deserved. The Second Circuit narrowly voted not to rehear the case, which prompted Judge Sotomayor’s longtime mentor and current judicial colleague Judge Jose Cabranes to issue a stern rebuke in his dissent:

“The use of per curiam opinions of this sort, adopting in full the reasoning of a district court without further elaboration, is normally reserved for cases that present straight-forward questions that do not require explanation or elaboration by the Court of Appeals,” Judge Cabranes wrote. “The questions raised in this appeal cannot be classified as such, as they are indisputably complex and far from well-settled.”
Indeed, as the Supreme Court recognized in taking up the all but non-existent decision by Judge Sotomayor’s panel, the case raises the ever-present and still unclear question of just when the government may rely on race in making employment -- indeed, any -- decisions.

To further complicate matters, the New Haven firefighters case seems to pit two different provisions of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 against each other.

Title VII’s primary theory of liability -- called “disparate treatment” -- prohibits employers from intentionally discriminating against employees (or potential employees) on the basis of their race, color, religion, sex or national origin. Such discrimination is easily understood and all but universally condemned.
At the same time, however, Title VII includes another theory of liability -- called “disparate impact” -- which, as National Journal legal affairs columnist Stuart Taylor wrote, imposes liability “[e]ven [on] employers who intend no discrimination,” but that use employment tests on which certain “ethnic groups … fare badly.” As Taylor went on to explain: “The surest way for employers to avoid such disparate-impact liability has been to discard the anti-[intentional] discrimination principle and allocate jobs and promotions in part on the basis of ethnicity.”

In other words, the Ricci case is about not only whether the government can legally and constitutionally rely on race in making decisions about employment, but also whether the government is required to consider race in making employment decisions -- at least with respect to the tests and processes that can be used to screen and rank candidates.

Seen in this light, it is simply unforgiveable that Judge Sotomayor believed she satisfied her judicial duty by simply affirming the decision by the district court in a nine-sentence decision that included essentially no legal or constitutional reasoning whatsoever.

That’s why, to borrow the words of television’s Ricky Ricardo, Judge Sotomayor has “got some ’splainin’ to do” when the Supreme Court decides the New Haven firefighters case next week. If she wants to be confirmed as one of the nine final arbiters of what the “supreme Law of the Land” means, why did Judge Sotomayor have nothing to say about such a fundamental and obvious question as whether the Fourteenth Amendment or Title VII means the government cannot rely on race in making employment decisions?
We thought the virtue of nominating federal appeals court judges for the highest court in the land was they prove themselves first with on-the-job training. But, at least in the Ricci case, Judge Sotomayor didn’t prove herself at all, except that she could sit behind the bench.
Back to top Go down
 
Sotomayor’s Got Some ’Splainin’ To Do
Back to top 
Page 1 of 1

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Illuminate Ur Self  :: Conspiracies or Realities :: The Global Currency Crash-
Jump to:  
Make a forum | © phpBB | Free forum support | Contact | Report an abuse | Forumotion.com